• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Action for Race Equality

Action for Race Equality

Empowering Young People who are Black, Asian and of Mixed Heritage

  • Donate
  • ARE at Work
    • Programmes & Projects
      • Building Ethnic Diversity in the Youth Employability Sector
      • Evidence into Action
      • The Graduate Connector Programme
      • Routes2Success
      • Stronger Futures
      • UPLIFT Programme
      • Windrush Justice Programme
    • Education
    • Employment
      • Ethnicity Pay Gap
      • A Journey to Inclusion
    • Criminal justice
      • Alliance for Police Accountability
      • The Gangs Matrix
    • Policy and Research
      • Donate
  • Who we ARE
    • Team
    • Trustees
    • Funders
    • Youth Action Network
    • History
  • ARE Community
    • Voluntary & Community organisations
    • Young People
    • Schools, colleges and training organisations
    • Collective Impact Partnerships
    • ARE as policy makers and researchers
    • Diversity & Inclusion Experts
    • Media
    • Businesses
  • Training & Consultancy
  • ARE Voices
  • Take action
    • Work with us
    • Youth Voice
  • Show Search
Hide Search
Home/ARE comment/EQUAL’s response to the MoJ

EQUAL’s response to the MoJ

Youth Justice 
Evidence shows that despite the serious concerns raised in the Lammy Review about the over-representation of BAME children in the youth justice system, it remains a serious problem. It is disappointing that the Youth Justice Board (YJB) is only now considering research into the Youth Justice System (YJS). The observations in the Lammy Review make it clear that further research should be undertaken; so a two year delay requires justification. 

Over 50% of the children in custody are BAME. Black children are particularly over-represented and more likely to be placed in Youth Offending Institutions (YOIs) than Secure Training Centres (STCs) and despite the numerous different work streams BAME disproportionality in youth custody has increased since the publication of the Lammy Review. Reoffending rates also remain high, especially amongst black children (under 18).[1] 

Addressing disproportionality must be an ongoing priority for the YJB and Youth Custody Service (YCS). The creation of the YJB Stakeholder Engagement Group and the YCS Oversight Group are welcome but we would encourage both the YJB and YCS to demonstrate there is sufficient external BAME expertise within these groups. 

Acknowledgement of the multi-generational lack of trust in the CJS and how this may impact upon parental engagement with the YJS is important. It is our view that trust, or a lack it, is one of the primary reasons for BAME community disengagement with the CJS, so we welcome work to address this. 

It is positive to see the collaborative approach being taken by the YJB in supporting the work of Alliance of Sport, encouraging the use of sport to deter BAME children from entering the YJS. The same goes for the collaborative work that is taking place with the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC).  It is encouraging to see that other key players in policy and decision making in policing have recognised the need for a focus on BAME disproportionality. 

More generally, the Government has rightly made significant funds available through the Youth Endowment Fund and Youth Futures Foundation to support disadvantaged young people. However, there is no evidence that these funds are supporting projects led by BAME organisations that help to keep BAME children and young people away from the CJS. 

Pages: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6

Published on:
04/01/2022

Categories: ARE comment, ARE voices, criminal justice, EQUAL, policy, programmeTags: Comment, criminal justice, EQUAL, youth justice

Primary Sidebar

Areas of work

  • News
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Criminal justice
  • Training & Consultancy
  • Policy & Research
  • ARE voices

Latest

  • Met Police’s review of its vetting and hiring practices highlights serious failings; so, let’s not use EDI as a scapegoat.
  • Join Action for Race Equality (ARE) as its Programmes and Finance Coordinator
  • Join The Alliance for Police Accountability (APA) as Development Officer

Popular

  • The Hamilton Commission
  • Showing racism the red card
  • Steep rise in unemployment for young black men
  • Response to Public Accounts Committee on apprenticeships
  • Institutional racism, a leadership challenge

Explore more

Looking for information on a completed Action for Race Equality project? If you can’t find it on our website, let us know.

Services for business and not-for-profits.

Training and Consultancy

Footer

Registered Charity No 1056043
Company registration No 03203812

Action for Race Equality © 2026

  • Privacy Policy
  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Contact
  • Training & Consultancy
  • News
  • Opportunity
  • Publications
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

We use cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT