• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Action for Race Equality

Action for Race Equality

Empowering Young People who are Black, Asian and of Mixed Heritage

  • Donate
  • ARE at Work
    • Programmes & Projects
      • Building Ethnic Diversity in the Youth Employability Sector
      • Evidence into Action
      • The Graduate Connector Programme
      • Routes2Success
      • Stronger Futures
      • UPLIFT Programme
      • Windrush Justice Programme
    • Education
    • Employment
      • Ethnicity Pay Gap
      • A Journey to Inclusion
    • Criminal justice
      • Alliance for Police Accountability
      • The Gangs Matrix
    • Policy and Research
      • Donate
  • Who we ARE
    • Team
    • Trustees
    • Funders
    • Youth Action Network
    • History
  • ARE Community
    • Voluntary & Community organisations
    • Young People
    • Schools, colleges and training organisations
    • Collective Impact Partnerships
    • ARE as policy makers and researchers
    • Diversity & Inclusion Experts
    • Media
    • Businesses
  • Training & Consultancy
  • ARE Voices
  • Take action
    • Work with us
    • Youth Voice
  • Show Search
Hide Search
Home/ARE comment/Racial justice organisations call out Metropolitan Police’s response to Casey Review

Racial justice organisations call out Metropolitan Police’s response to Casey Review

Action for Race Equality (ARE), along with a coalition of racial justice organisations have written an open letter to Sir Mark Rowley, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service, expressing deep concern with its response to the Casey Review, its ‘New Met for London’ Plan.

The letter, co-ordinated by the Runnymede Trust and signed by groups and individuals including ARE, Inquest, Stopwatch, BEO and Lord Simon Woolley, outlines regret for a missed opportunity for the Met to signal that it intends to radically change, and acknowledge where the wrongdoing and deep failures are rooted. The continued refusal to acknowledge the institutional nature of racism within the Met, alongside proposed plans for further expansion of the scale, practices, and tools it currently employs, will only further entrench disproportionalities in how Black and minority ethnic Londoners are policed.

In the last week alone, the IOPC have launched investigations into the death of a Black man who died in police custody earlier this month, and an instance widely shared on social media of a Black woman who was handcuffed, in front of her young son, after being wrongfully accused of not paying her bus fare. Six Met officers are currently under investigation for handcuffing a 90-year-old Black woman with dementia and putting her in a spit hood. We recall in recent memory the deaths of Chris Kaba and Oladeji Omishore following contact with Met officers; the grotesque treatment of Nicole Smallman and Bibaa Henry by Met officers; Child Q and the hundreds of children strip searched by Met officers; and the exposure of Met officers demeaning their Black and minority ethnic colleagues.

The deep seated failures of British police forces require a crisis-level response. Of particular concern is the lack of openness as to who was consulted in drafting these proposals outlined in the ‘New Met for London’ Plan, and a lack of accountability for how they are delivered, and the outcomes they achieve.

The letter calls for an equalities impact assessment into the ongoing use of databases, predictive policing algorithms and surveillance technologies, such as the Gangs Violence Matrix and facial recognition technology, which are already evidenced to be discriminatory. It also states that preventing crime and anti-social behaviour requires addressing the root causes of crime; eradicating poverty, access to good education, housing and health care and the equality of opportunity for all.

Serious concerns are raised over the call for a further £336m of Met funding, a public service which has received hundreds of recommendations on how to address the excessive and disproportionate policing of Black and minority ethnic Londoners, yet has failed to implement them for decades. The letter strongly advocates for investment to be directed instead into evidence-based approaches that tackle the root causes of crime. These include essential social infrastructure such as community-based youth and mental health support services, affordable housing and education initiatives.

Dr Shabna Begum, Interim co-CEO of the Runnymede Trust, said:

We are at an absolute crisis point with regards to how Black and minority ethnic communities are policed, and there is a failure to offer an appropriate, crisis-level response. Our communities face punitive and punishing policing that has for decades stripped away confidence and consent. Despite publishing an 80-page plan for reform, these proposals fail to inspire confidence in the feasibility of what feels like yet another series of promises, nor do they set out how the Met can be held accountable in any defined way.

We all deserve to feel safe in our communities, and in our interactions with state institutions which are supposedly there to keep us safe, but this plan for ‘A New Met for London’ is wholly disappointing, very little feels new, even less feels like a concrete plan, and all our communities in London deserve better.
We recognise the need for greater funding – but disagree with where that funding should go; we know that in terms of meeting crime reduction, it is significant and sustained investment into community-based solutions that tackle the root causes of crime.”

read the letter with all signatores

Published on:
28/07/2023

Categories: ARE comment, ARE news, ARE voices, criminal justice, social justice

Primary Sidebar

Areas of work

  • News
  • Education
  • Employment
  • Criminal justice
  • Training & Consultancy
  • Policy & Research
  • ARE voices

Latest

  • ARE statement on the Bondi Beach attack
  • What ‘Really’ Works for Black and Asian-led Organisations?
  • Make More Launches “Healing Through Justice”: A Well-Being Project for Windrush Survivors

Popular

  • The Hamilton Commission
  • Showing racism the red card
  • Steep rise in unemployment for young black men
  • Response to Public Accounts Committee on apprenticeships
  • Institutional racism, a leadership challenge

Explore more

Looking for information on a completed Action for Race Equality project? If you can’t find it on our website, let us know.

Services for business and not-for-profits.

Training and Consultancy

Footer

Registered Charity No 1056043
Company registration No 03203812

Action for Race Equality © 2025

  • Privacy Policy
  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Contact
  • Training & Consultancy
  • News
  • Opportunity
  • Publications
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

We use cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorised as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyse and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Go to mobile version